This looks good to me Chris
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 12:35, Jon Lapham wrote: > Jeff MacDonald wrote: > > I respectfully disagree with use of "in development".. we *know* it's in > > development, and newbies might think that if it's in development it is > > somehow unstable or that they should look for 'better' documentation > > instead. just be careful about wording :) > > I agree 100%. > > Check out the HTML-ified version of my proposal I just made. > > http://www.jandr.org/temp/www.gnucash.org/ > http://www.jandr.org/temp/www.gnucash.org/documentation.html > > By "in development" documentation I meant for some future version of > gnucash that doesn't exist as the stable version yet. We would want > newbies to not use it. I think it is probably clearer to look at the > example pages I made. > > The "in developement" version of docs for the stable version of GnuCash > would simply be the v1.8 docs (in this case). The words "in > development" would not appear. > > Thanks, > -Jon -- RedHat Certified Engineer #807302549405490. Checkpoint Certified Security Expert 2000 & NG -------------------------------------------- |^| | | |^| | |^| | | Life out here is raw | | |^| | But we will never stop | |_|_| | We will never quit | / __> | cause we are Metallica |/ / | \ / | | -------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
