Copying gnucash-devel....
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 02:12, Tony Watts wrote: > So it is not just that function but the whole of gnc_tree_model that > should go? Yes. The only place the code should access the tree model directly is in a callback filter function. Update your tree and read the file src/doc/g2-architecture.txt. You can also look at the file GNOME2_STATUS in the top directory so see what I think still needs work. > It wasnt a problem before, did you just block out the code > and insert the g_assert recently? Yes, in my last round of commits where I converted everything else over to use the account tree view. I was cleaning up routines in the account tree model, saw that one, and added the g_assert(). If the druid hadn't had a call to the function I would have deleted it entirely. > I will have a go with the druid hierachy file and if it is a success I > can try and replace all other calls to the gnc_tree_model if that is > what is required. I think the hierarchy druid is the only problem but haven't grepped the code again to check. See g2-architecture.txt to see what's "legal" and what isn't. David
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
