Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I don't have currently a real plan for what will come in 1.6; most >> probably 1.6 will be mostly source-compatible to 1.4, but excluding >> the GLib bindings and having a few new features. 1.8 (or 2.0, since >> that is a really major change) will base upon my TNG work; at least >> this is my rough development plan. > > Well, we still need bindings for glists, gslists, and a few other glib > features (which I can't think of at the moment). It would be NICE if > g-wrap 1.4 at least maintained this. > It will.
> (but perhaps built against glib-2 instead of glib-1.2). > You'll have to talk this over with Rob. >> I did expect this ;). However, Guile-GObject will most probably join >> the Gnome Platform Bindings[0] for GNOME 2.8, and then we'll have >> strict requirements[1] on both release schedule and API stability. > > Gnucash always delays dependencies, so that means we wont release > anything that uses this until at least 6 months later (or more). But > for gnome-2.8 you're talking at least a year away from now, so that's > not something on the gnucash-2 radar. > See my other mail - I don't really have any idea what the Gnome2 port status is and how long it is expected to take until a release. I probably *will* play around with making GnuCash use Guile-GObject, however. I'll announce any significant progress, maybe someone will be interested and have a look at it. How is the general view on having a playfield area to experiment with stuff like that? I have made a Arch[0] "mirror" of the GnuCash GNOME2 CVS branch, so have a convinient sandbox and will use that to test (and fix in case of problems) GnuCash with the bleeding edge (GNOME 2.6, as soon as it hits Debian unstable, Guile CVS, SLIB 3 (which breaks GnuCash, easy fix though), ...). BTW: Is there any page that documents all the GnuCash rules wrt. dependencies and related stuff, e.g. what dependencies GnuCash 2 will have? > While I'm very happy to see g-wrap development progressing, it's at a > point where I'd like to see gnucash's dependency on gnome get reduced. > Well, Guile-GObject will be split into core (including GLib/GObject stuff) and other modules, like GTK+ (in fact this a requirement to fulfill the Platform Bindings rules), so you would only have to depend on the core of Guile-GObject (which will be renamed into Guile-GNOME in the future). Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
