So is there any validity in multiplying the number of shares I bought in
December 1997 at $5.00 a share with the current value of $10.87 a share?
And there in lies a crux for this matter. What is the cost of a stock. Are
we recording historical cost or current cost. If it is current cost where
do we recognize the commission that we had to pay the brocker?
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Hasler
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 12:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Inventory and payroll
Phillip Shelton writes:
> What, (in your opinion John) is the number that is the result of
> multiplying the number of shares and the share price.
The purchase price? An approximation of the cost of the purchase.
> And, (again, persumable) one buys shares to increase ones equtity. Are
> shares considered part of assets?
Of course.
> Is the unrealised value of any stock (be it shares, engines, pens or
> ... ) part of ones worth?
One normally carries securities on one's books at cost (There are
situations that require that an asset be "written down", but they are
exceptions).
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
