Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, this code would clearly be optimized out by the compiler. But
> > why can't you generate a code block that looks like:
> >
> > {
> > enum GW__ErrorStatus gw__tmp564_status_var = GW__ERR_NONE;
> > SCM gw__tmp566_err_data = SCM_UNSPECIFIED;
> > char *gw__tmp565_err_misc_msg = NULL;
> >
> > (void)gw__tmp564_status_var;
> > (void)gw__tmp566_err_data;
> > (void)gw__tmp565_err_misc_msg;
> > }
>
> Hmm. This might be OK, and I think I can add that without any
> trouble.
This will (should?) solve the unused variable problem. I agree
that the unitialized variable problem will be more difficult
to solve.
> Thanks
NP.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
