No, at the moment, the binaries are different. Apple does not provide a way to load dylibs at runtime. Any solution would involve hacking the OS. The only solution to building gnucash on my Mac is to install linux on it :-(.
This completely sucks, there must be another way. Anyway, I should have asked earlier before I spent most of my Sunday starting "fixing" the (insert all swear words known to man) thing. What will fixing it require? Surely It just involves linking the libs twice with different names (eg libxyz libmodxyz libgw-xyz) and being careful about the interdependencies? Yes, I know that there are a lot of modules... Unhappy, Peter On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 02:06 AM, Bill Gribble wrote: > On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 08:55, Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> Please use -module only for things which need to be loaded at >> runtime, anything that needs to be linked against doesn't need >> this. > > Please don't "fix" this. The use of -module is intentional and > removing > it will break gnucash. At the moment, gnucash depends on being able to > both link against and dynamically load its modules. That's > unfortunate, > but fixing the problem will require much more than just removing > -module. > > It's unfortunate that this breaks compilation on Mac OS X. Is > there any > way to make it possible to both link against and runtime load libraries > on that OS? > > Thanks, > Bill Gribble > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel