On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 18:28, Zach Garner wrote: > I, of course, have other things to do than track CVS current gnucash > code, just to use an accounting program and have data sent to my > spreadsheet program.
A patch for stable source would be just fine. However, my memory is jogged by looking at the xml code again. I think we started adding the namespace declarations and realized that it changed the behavior of the libxml parser in ways that required more than a few changes for us. No one is currently working on this problem, either in stable or in devel cvs. So it's unlikely to be fixed any time soon. > As far as cvs current is concerned, things have changed greatly. XML > support in Gnucash looks a great deal more complicated (and flexible). > In addition, it looks like some support for Namespaces has been > implemented. As I said above, no one is working on finishing it atm. > I really wish more discussion would have went into whether or not the > contributed (attached to my first email) XSL translation from gnucash -> > gnumeric is something the gnucash project is interested in, rather than > argument over namespaces (I assume this is my fault, of course). I > suppose I will continue working on it privately, and avoid starting > another argument here. I think a utility like this would be nice. If it required an additional dependency, then making it optional would be better. dave
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
