Geert, It took a little bit, but I have added Bug 782455 as an enhancement request. It’s not a uservoice page, but I have never liked that tool anyway.
David > On Apr 28, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Geert Janssens <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On woensdag 26 april 2017 00:39:08 CEST Mike or Penny Novack wrote: >> On 4/25/2017 2:21 PM, david.carlson.417 wrote: >>> David T, >>> My personal preference would be to replace the line under the >>> description with a comment similar to "Reverses transaction dated >>> mm/dd/yyyy" David C >> >> And here is where I would express a strong preference for "free form" >> because SIMPLY reversing a transaction is not the only sort of >> "reversing" transaction. I might be wanting to say things like >> "correcting the amount" or "posting to correct account", etc. >> > If with "Free form" you mean "User editable" I can agree. > > However the default text should definitely mention "Reversing" as that's the > true intended behavior of the "Revert transaction" menu option. > > Other than tat it's great to see others are creatively using it to avoid > laborious typing. > > On vrijdag 28 april 2017 01:40:15 CEST Adrien Monteleone wrote: >> Could an additional “jump” entry be placed in the context menu for reversed >> transactions? Instead of the current jump to the ledger on the other side >> of a split, this jump would hop to the transaction that has been reversed. >> > Anything is possible as long as there's someone with time available to > implement :) > > More seriously, while certainly possible it will be more challenging to > implement this without cluttering the interface and avoid confusion because > of > the other meaning of jump. Still such a direct link could be very convenient. > >> An additional UI helper might be to use the NUM or ACTION fields to indicate >> that this is a Reversing/Correcting transaction. >> > Good suggestion as well. > > > > David T., > > Thanks for starting the discussion. You brought up a good point and it > solicited several good additional suggestions. As far as I'm concerned please > go ahead and file it as an enhancement request. I think our uservoice > instance > [1] is the best spot for this as it allows vote. This gives useful feedback > about what users consider priority with regards to new features to add. > > Geert > > [1] https://gnucash.uservoice.com/forums/101223-feature-request > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
