Thank you, Aleksey
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Derek Atkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > ar <[email protected]> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I had just switched to gnucash from many years of quicken. So, far it > works > > fine. > > > > The only problem is account matching. I am not looking into something > fancy > > - the vast majority of our expenses is in less than 10 stores and less > than > > 10 gas stations, everything else I can classify manually. > > > > In addition to that there are quirks/bugs per reporting company. > > > > I suppose I can easily write a script that will perform proper matching. > > However, I am using it on win10 and there are no python bindings. Hence I > > have to write a standalone pre-processor that will read downloaded file, > > fix the quirks and add explicit account-id string. > > > > My current plan is to generate .csv file and then import it. Should I > > target .qif instead? What strings should I use as account-ids in .csv > file? > > Say if want something to be matched to 'Expenses:Auto:Gas' what string > > should I use? Should I add any configuration for this to happen? > > I would recommend yes, convert it to qif. Then you can add a QIF > Category: > > LExpenses:Auto:Gas > > which the importer will default to the GnuCash Account of the same name. > If you need to insert an Asset/Liability then you can insert a QIF > Account: > > L[Assets:Checking] > > and the same thing will happen. > > > Thank you, > > > > Aleksey > > > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > > -derek > > -- > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH > [email protected] PGP key available > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
