Hi,
Just a quick follow-up.
AT&T did come, and with their help we debugged the network only to
discover that it's something inside my network that is causing their
modem to go all futzy.
I'm now in the process of trying to debug further, but it's going to
take time. Expect further interuptions until I can isolate the issue.
-derek
Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu> writes:
> Hi,
>
> tl;dr: AT&T is coming to fix some network issues tomorrow, Sunday,
> between 1-4pm EDT; service can last up to 2 hours and may involve
> several network outages.
>
> LONG VERSION:
>
> As some of you may have noticed, there have been some network issues to
> code which started just over a week ago. One of the downsides was
> significant packet loss and gncbot disappearing from IRC. Alas, I had
> been out of the country while this was happening and couldn't start to
> really look into it; I restarted gncbot several times while I was away
> but due to the persistent network issues it regularly would lost
> contact.
>
> I'm seeing anywhere from 20-40% packet loss and ping times to my
> immediate router anywhere from 200-1000ms (whereas it's usually 3-4ms).
> I called AT&T, my ISP, and they are sending a tech tomorrow, Sunday,
> October 1, between 1-4pm EDT. The maintenance could potentially take 2
> hours once they arrive, but of course it all depends on what the issue
> is.
>
> This will affect code, lists, and wiki services including email, gncbot,
> etc.
>
> I'll attempt to keep people informed over IRC, assuming of course that I
> can get online prior to the work being done.
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>
> -derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warl...@mit.edu PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
