> On Feb 28, 2018, at 8:16 PM, just me <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > Hi John, > > may I ask you, maybe I am doing something wrong or it can be issue with > cmake scripts, but my version is always linked against guile1.8 > regardless of any tried options... > > I am under Arch Linux, up to date, it has guile package (2.2 version), > guile2.0 (2.0 version), and there is a possibility to install guile1.8 > (1.8 version) > > I tried to cmake with > -D GUILD_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/guild -D GUILE_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/guile > (for 2.2 version) > -D GUILD_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/guild2.0 -D > GUILE_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/guile2.0 (for 2.0) version > also tried without any options > > It compiles just fine, for any options set, both in the presence of > guile1.8 and without it... > > But when running it, not having guile1.8 installed, it dumps a core > because of segfault. Stracing shows that it is looking libguile.so.17 > which is a part of guile1.8 package... > > I was need it urgently, so I simply installed guile1.8, but I am > feeling that it is wrong, it have to be linked against that user have > installed... > > So is it my mistake somehow, or assembly scripts issue? Could you > advise please?
Andrei, You may not. Please address all inquiries to the user list, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or the developer list, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. As it happens I’m not the expert on anything to do with Guile so it’s particularly misguided to ask me anything about it. You need to tell us what version of GnuCash you’re building, the CMakeLists.txt have diverged rather a lot between maint and unstable/master. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
