Under each account for which this can occur, I create a subaccount called “ACH” for “Automated Clearing House,” so when the originating account registers the transfer transaction, the target account’s subaccount “ACH” gets the corresponding split. Then, when the receiving account registers the transaction, I put the matching inverse split in the ACH and the closing deposit in its parent account.
This sequence matches what really happens (Source ->ACH then ACH->Target), with the added benefit that the Target account, when opened with “Include Subaccounts” checked, shows the true expected value of the deposit. I have an ACH account as a subaccount of both my bank account and my investment accounts. > Message: 13 > Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 19:35:30 -0700 > From: Kate Kelly <kken...@gmail.com <mailto:kken...@gmail.com>> > To: rlagg...@mail.com <mailto:rlagg...@mail.com> > Cc: gnucash-user@gnucash.org <mailto:gnucash-user@gnucash.org> > Subject: Re: [GNC] how do I get different dates for balancing > transactions when transferring amounts between two accounts > Message-ID: > <CANbW8pFi51LPsRu0pnPmowqJ4Dft4KA=z7hsx4a4szsmtym...@mail.gmail.com > <mailto:CANbW8pFi51LPsRu0pnPmowqJ4Dft4KA=z7hsx4a4szsmtym...@mail.gmail.com>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Hi Rufus, > > I am a bookkeeper and former CPA. > > An account that is often used for checks not yet sent to the bank is > "undeposited funds." This is similar to a suspense account in that there is > a timing difference between the receipt of a check and the time you > actually deposit it. You could debit the undeposited funds account for the > amount of the payment. When the check clears the receiving bank, credit > Undeposited Funds and debit your Checking account. You could add the check > number to the memo line or record the deposit as DEP#### (#### being the > check number. > > 1. Write check # 1718 for $100: > Undeposited Funds $100 > Checking Account A $100 > > 2. Check clears the receiving bank: > Checking Account B $100 > Undeposited Funds. $100 > > I hope this helps. > > Kate > > > On Mon, May 14, 2018, 3:21 PM RL <rlagg...@mail.com > <mailto:rlagg...@mail.com>> wrote: > >> I have two bank accounts on which I regularly write checks to transfer >> amounts between them. Downloading the ofx files from each bank, I have, >> for those checks, transactions with different (correct) dates in each GC >> account which represent the left and right side of the same accounting >> transaction. For purposes of reconciling against the bank statements, >> these dates must remain different in their separate GC accounts, even >> though they are opposite ends of the same accounting transaction. >> >> GC wants to make the balancing transactions in each GC account one >> single identical transaction (except for the proper credit/debit column, >> depending on which account I'm looking at). I don't see how to work this >> and maintain both accounts true to their source, the bank transactions. >> The date is also important because at times it matters when a check was >> cashed and when it was payed by the originating bank; there needs to be >> an accurate record of this. An additional, maybe lesser, problem is that >> GC's methodology makes the transaction number the same in each GC >> account. Since the trans number is one of the most easily noted text >> fields, I have been using it to quickly/easily identify "deposits" - but >> this won't work if I want to retain the check number in that field (very >> important). Also, a check number on a deposit line doesn't seem >> particularly proper. >> >> How is this handled in GC? >> >> >> Thanks >> Rufus >> _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
