Hi Indra, Good to hear it works after all.
Geert Op donderdag 9 augustus 2018 13:22:00 CEST schreef Indra: > Hi Geert,strange, I tried it again today, now can import those splits with > each memo. I think I did something wrong with the import option. > I tried reproducing the double entry and cannot, the import is working fine. > Thanks > > On Thursday, August 9, 2018, 1:42:46 PM GMT+7, Geert Janssens > <[email protected]> wrote: > Op zaterdag 4 augustus 2018 11:13:19 CEST schreef Indra via gnucash-user: > > Hi I'm new to GNC, I'm trying to re-import CSV generated by same version > > of > > GNC(version 3.2). I saw previous email that version 2.6 cannot import CSV > > generated by GnuCash (containing 2 split). And this re-import from > > exported > > CSV issue is solved since version 2.8 I just tested exporting simple > > transaction from my accounts > > 1 transaction with 2 splits with memo on each split. > > I deleted the transaction from UI and reimport using the generated CSV > > (checked the multi-split option). The importer should recreate 1 > > transaction with 2 splits with their memo.But now after import, I have 2 > > transactions instead of 1. first transaction contain memo for split 1 with > > description. > > > > second transaction contain memo for split 2 WITHOUT description. > > > > Is this multi-split CSV importer working and tested? > > Thanks > > Hi, > > The multi-split csv importer is working fine here. I have just verified this > again on my system by exporting an account and re-importing it. > > What settings did you use in the preview ? Did you select the "Gnucash > Export" preset ? > > Regards, > > Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
