Thanks, but all 3 views still have the same view of 3 or 4 lines.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: David Carlson <[email protected]>
Date: 10/9/18 8:21 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: varda241 <[email protected]>
Cc: Gnucash Users <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [GNC] checking account
Hi Varda241,
It sounds like you are used to seeing the Basic Ledger View with a single line
setting. Possibly, the Funds In and Funds Out columns were called Deposit and
Withdrawal. These features can be changed easily. If you go to the
Gnucash.org website and find the Help manual and Tutoria and start in the help
Manual then go to
https://www.gnucash.org/docs/v3/C/gnucash-guide/txns-register-oview.html#txns-regstyle1
in the tutorial you will find out how flexible the view settings are.
David C
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 7:02 PM Varda Rotenberg via gnucash-user
<[email protected]> wrote:
Had to reinstall gnucash on ubuntu 2.6.19. It will not download 3.3. The
checking accound basic ledger is now 4 lines, with new columns added, "funds in
" and "funds out" attaching a screen shot. Could not find an instructions for
the previous double line entry. Attaching a screen shot.Any
Help?Varda._______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
[email protected]
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
[email protected]
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
