Milan, The reconcile and import matcher windows use different code even though there are some similarities in identifying matching transactions.
Which version of the matching are you using in the importer (see Edit->Preferences-Online Banking and the bayesian matching checkbox)? The importer matches on the basis of "tokens" for the data in the transaction fields. Repeated transactions with the same amount from the same source tend to get matched even though the dates are "wrong". As dates between manually entered data and data imported from a bank may very considerably, the developers seem to have erred on the side of making it likely to pick up any possible matching transaction to avoid duplicating transactions. I don't think the current methodology has any way of knowing about the period of repeated transactions. It may be possible as a future development if for example some specific transaction sources could be flagged as periodic and tokens developed to flag this and the expected periodicity. If you think this is needed raise a feature request at bugs.gnucash.org. David Cousens ----- David Cousens -- Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-User-f1415819.html _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
