David Cousens <davidcous...@bigpond.com> writes:
> Phil
>
>> Wait until the next reconciliation is due and it will be included
> with it. Works for me.
>
> While that resets the reconciliation flag, it may not necessarily
> ensure that past reconciliations are correctly
> reconciled forward from the editied transactions were altered in cases
> where the edit involved changing amount details
> in the splits affecting the reconciled account. If the changes were
> simply to description and memo fields or only to
> amounts in splits to unreconciled accounts, then what you suggest will
> work. Redoing the procedure from the period
> covering the edit forward ensures that this is the case.
If you change the amounts in the splits then even a current reconcile
will fail, too, so you're safe either way.
> David
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warl...@mit.edu PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
