Interesting. I seem to recall someone instructing people to use only lists.gnucash.org for such searches, and was not aware of the reference you cite. A search of the wiki only shows an example for lists.gnucash.org on the mailing lists page. I must be showing my age...
David T. On January 16, 2019, at 4:56 AM, David Cousens <[email protected]> wrote: David, The link https://lists.gnucash.org/search/?idxinfo=gnucash-user suggest using either Google or Nabble to search the archives as the Mailman interface is not searchable. No local search Currently, there is no on-site mechanism to search the GnuCash mailing lists. Instead, you can search the lists using one of these external sites: Google Nabble These links prepopulate the search form with the list you want to search. If for some reason that didn't happen (e.g. if JavaScript is disabled): For Google In the search bar, type site:lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/list-name to search a specific list, or site:lists.gnucash.org to search them all For Nabble By default, all of the lists will be searched. The individual lists can be found at the Sub-forums link David Cousens ----- David Cousens -- Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-User-f1415819.html _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
