Chris, While I understand and respect the goal of backward compatibility, I'll point out that your changes to this report have already broken backward compatibility, as evidenced by my original example. Settings which worked previously yield meaningless results now, and I have had to go through every one of my reports that are based on the transaction report and fix what got broken. For my use case (not all that exotic, IMHO), the setting appears to be broken; when transactions are shown, are you saying the transactions are reversed, but the totals are not? Because that would drive me crazy... Is there truly no way to store and calculate values internally to the report but display results the way the user requests to see them?
David On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 7:13, Christopher Lam<christopher....@gmail.com> wrote: Sadly, the gnucash project has a long history of never removing features. The amount sign reversal is still functional for the transactional amounts. Only the subtotals are unaffected. On Thu., 17 Jan. 2019, 09:08 D <sunfis...@yahoo.com wrote: Then why include the option? It no longer does anything, except imply to the user that they have control over something they Nik longer can control. David On January 17, 2019, at 6:27 AM, Christopher Lam <christopher....@gmail.com> wrote: This is by design. Previously a transaction report including *all* accounts for a specified period would erroneously add the sign-reversed amounts as displayed, which would lead to the grand total being a nonsensical number. Eg income $100 expense $50. Amounts:Bank $100 -$50Income $100Expense $50Grand total $200 (nonsense) From 3.0 onwards the subtotal strategy always adds the non-reversed amounts, which means the grand total for all accounts for any specified period would always be $0 thanks to the accounting equation. Bank $100 -$50Income -$100 (subtotal negative)Expense $50Grand total $0 On Thu., 17 Jan. 2019, 00:34 David T. <sunfis...@yahoo.com wrote: Chris, I do note one issue with the new transaction report: it doesn’t seem to utilize the Sign Reverses option—at least, not that I can see. Cheers, David > On Jan 16, 2019, at 7:29 PM, David T. via gnucash-user > <gnucash-user@gnucash.org> wrote: > > Chris, > > Thank you for the lead. > > It turns out that I can get almost exactly the same result using the hide > transactional data option, when I combine it with "Amount - Single”. The only > difference is that the Account name is not presented before the total line. I > consider that to be an improvement, actually. > > Bug avoided. > > David > >> On Jan 16, 2019, at 6:01 PM, Christopher Lam <christopher....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> There's "Sorting / Show subtotals only (hide transactional data)" >> >> You may be right that 'Display / Amount' = none is not completely handled as >> before. >> >> Please file a bug, and screenshot a sample report, anonymised; please enable >> 'General / Add options summary' to display options used. >> >> Also, https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795064 >> >> Thank you for finding these edge . _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
