So it is correct to say that 3.0 was the major release, and that 3.1, 3.2. etc were all subsequent minor releases?
Saying 3.x is the major release is ambiguous, to say the least. In that case, 3.1, 3.2, etc would all be major releases, because they all qualify as 3.x. It took me a while to work out what you were saying, and maybe I still haven’t. Peter -- Peter West p...@pbw.id.au “For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, coveting, wickedness, deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride, foolishness.” > On 13 Feb 2020, at 12:54 am, Derek Atkins <de...@ihtfp.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Please remember to CC gnucash-user on all replies... > > Peter West <p...@pbw.id.au> writes: > >> I assume that you mean: >> 3.0 is the major release, and 3.1, 3.2. etc are all the minor releases. So >> the >> next major release will be 4.0. >> >> Is this the case? > > I said exactly what I mean. > > Technically, 3.0 was the first of the 3.x major-release cycle, and 3.1, > 3.2, etc were all subsequent minor releases of the 3.x major-release > cycle. The next major release will be 4.x, starting with 4.0 as its > first release in the 4.x release cycle. > >> On 12 Feb 2020, at 2:12 am, Derek Atkins <de...@ihtfp.com> wrote: >> >> First, note that we changed the numbering scheme between 2.x and 3.x. >> This means that 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, and 2.6 are all *major* releases, with >> minor releases denoted in the third number. Whereas 3.x is the major >> release and 3.0, 3.1, etc. are all the minor releases. > > -derek > > -- > Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 > de...@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com > Computer and Internet Security Consultant _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
