Hello, I'm not a professional or accounting, But i wondering that Why you don't use Gnucash and Spreadsheet at the same time ? Like me.
Create a spreadsheet with name, date, amount, where they are sending money to, example : January, Peter, 3000$, paypal .. It's can be whatever you want. Using it for record the information and using Gnucash to Track your money in the real world. If i have multiple things to do with my money (funds), But my money stored only in 1 Bank, i will not trying to create sub-accounts for that bank account. I will create a spreadsheet, and update balance at the end of every day. Example : your total money are 1000$, there are multi funds, and "A fund" is 200$, you already wrote this in spreadsheet to alert you DO NOT USE OVER THAT MONEY. So, tomorrow, just pay whatever want with "A fund" without updating your balance in spreadsheet, because in GnuCash, use "tag" for your expense, and use "transaction report" with filter, and you will know the amount you spent ( i hope you didn't spend over 200$). At the end of the day, write this into spreadsheet to update your "A fund" balance. That it, you can't use only GnuCash for everything, Let talk about Report, GnuCash reports have a bad view, anyways, you will use spreadsheet to fix it or modify it before do something with that reports. So why don't use spreadsheet for have more information? Make your GnuCash control and look "real" instead create some "Virtual"? Of course, You can follow the ways that make GnuCash does the jobs for you. If i'm wrong, please tell me know. Thank you. Regards. -- Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-User-f1415819.html _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
