On 5/6/20 10:07 PM, Jeff wrote: > This has probably been discussed here before but; I'm going ask > anyway. Which do most people find more reliable with GNC, SQL or the > default XML? And are there any features I would lose other than the > rollback ability with SQL? > > I'm getting tired of having to track down account and report issues > every time Windoze 10 hiccups. I use the default XML, uncompressed. > One set of books has been corrupted several times, I'm assuming when > Windoze just simply kills the GNC program out of the blue. I have > another set of books for a business that so far, knock on wood, the > only problem is sometimes various buttons have to be selected multiple > times to work then all of the windows open in GNC blur while > processing then go back to normal display. > > My computers are all networked and dual boot Windoze and Ubuntu, so I > would need SQL on both sides if I switch over. I'm leaning towards > PostgreSQL (pro's, con's? Suggestions?). > I only use Ubuntu/XML (compressed).
-- Stephen M Butler, PMP, PSM [email protected] [email protected] 253-350-0166 ------------------------------------------- GnuPG Fingerprint: 8A25 9726 D439 758D D846 E5D4 282A 5477 0385 81D8 _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
