I had it in mind that the SX would be for the interest payments, but yes, one would use a variable for the debit/credit so that the actual amount can be entered each time.
I think the use-case for the CC payment transfer dialog is that users would get the CC statement, reconcile it, and then set up the payment. SXes aren't trigger-able by actions so it wouldn't fit that model, but ISTM the dialog is a bit superfluous: When you finish the reconcile you're back at the CC register, so just go to the blank transaction if focus happens to be somewhere else and create the payment transaction. Quickfill will do most of the work, but you will have to enter the amount you paid. Regards, John Ralls > On Jul 13, 2020, at 12:15 PM, Adrien Monteleone > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I suppose if the SX contained a variable, the user could be prompted for that > reconciled balance. > > Regards, > Adrien > > On 7/12/20 5:02 PM, John Ralls wrote: > >> To your points: A Scheduled Transaction is an even better reminder and quick >> fill (aka autocomplete) in the register will fill in the last payment >> account too. What quickfill won't do is pre-populate the credit field with >> the reconciled balance. > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > [email protected] > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
