> On Jul 25, 2020, at 9:13 PM, Liz Dodd <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 15:04:22 -0500
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Your suggestion about a second person to handle the cash is a good
>> idea. One of my longstanding complaints has been that no one ever
>> looks at any of the finances except me. We are a group of about 300
>> members with maybe 20 that take an active role in the organization.
>> There is too much to do and no one wants to spend energy on something
>> that isn't broken.
>>
>> As far as checks go, no one uses them in Mexico. No one writes them
>> and no one will cash them. Bank transfers serve the same purpose.
>>
>> Will
>
> Lots of the world no longer uses cheques (or checks). The latest
> improvement here is that I can instantly receive money sent to me,
> identified by an email address or phone number which I have registered.
Did nobody read the footnote? The book was published in 1985, long before
electronic payments became widely available. No doubt the 2020 edition would
say something like "independently documented transfer" with a mention somewhere
that that used to mean a check but now covers a variety of payment methods.
Incidentally, the textbook also says that checks should ideally require two
signatures. I don't know how to impose that control over electronic transfers
but the local newspaper reports two or three cases of embezzlement a year where
it's obvious that a two-person control would have prevented the crime.
Regards,
John Ralls
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
[email protected]
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
