On Sun, 13 Jun 2021 09:10:42 +0000 Tim Hume <[email protected]> wrote: > I just ran a test. My data file is 37 MByte in SQLite format, and 52 > MByte when in XML and uncompressed. However, the compressed XML is > under 4 MByte. > > It took 1m 17s to open GnuCash with the compressed XML file, and 55s > with the SQLite file. I'd recommend the SQLite format based on these > tests.
Thank you for your input! I am getting pretty much the same result - ~15s and just wonder whether Sqlite3 could be considered more robust storage format although I keep XML uncompressed under VCS (Fossil)? Sincerely, Gour -- One who restrains the senses of action but whose mind dwells on sense objects certainly deludes himself and is called a pretender. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
