No big deal, I have the same problem in person, but agree text can make
it worse. Any clue where those question marks in the quote of my e-mail
are coming from? I didn't type them and don't see them in my sent
message, but they certainly make it look disingenuous.
On 12/10/21 4:08 PM, Colin Arndt wrote:
Hi Dustin,
Allow me to apologize as well, if I misread your message as being
harsher than it was. It’s easy to do that over text and it wouldn’t be
my first time. At the very least - I learned what shotgun
argumentation is!
I’ll take a crack at that new wiki section soon.
Thanks everyone,
Colin
On Dec 10, 2021, at 12:28 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Dave & group,
In case Colin is correct, allow me to apologize (hopefully not equally
poorly) for being out of line here and now.? I'm sorry if I seemed
accusatory or offensive, as that was not my intent.? While I do believe
that this conversation has run its course, I would like to elaborate a
bit on my choice of words.? Perhaps ad hominem is not the correct
definition for the ISO discussion, but I do believe that the number of
bullet points provided with little-to-nothing to do with currency does
qualify as shotgun argumentation.? Regardless my intent was to instill
self-reflection, not recoil.
Colin,
While I have no official capacity here, I would encourage you to go
ahead with the wiki contributions if you have relevant access.? After
all, it is a wiki.
Dustin
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
[email protected]
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
