On 2022-04-12 19:57, Adrien Monteleone wrote: > There might be very good reasons why someone would pause an SX and want > it to fill-in past instances after un-pausing. Testing, troubleshooting, > verifying something, trial scenarios, et cetera come to mind off the top > of my head.
Agreed, and also someone might want to create a new SX with a start date in the past. When I was changing my 2011-2017 accounting data from dBASE to GnuCash, I used SX for a number of monthly accruals to reduce the amount of typing I had to do. I could also see creating a stream of transactions in the past if I got an annual bill for some service and realized I'd forgotten to enter the monthly amortization accruals. > I agree, the behavior should not be changed, but perhaps the UI could > be improved if people aren't realizing what is going on. I concur very strongly on the fist point, and somewhat more mildly on the second. :-) -- Stan Brown Tehachapi, CA, USA https://BrownMath.com _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
