Sorry I've been away from the list It sounds like your particular issue was not addressed in the updates. Have you yet opened a bug on Bugzilla?
https://bugs.gnucash.org/ Be sure to include your test case you described at the beginning of this thread. If you have never filed a bug before, you may have to register with bugzilla. You might also find some of the information in the wiki helpful (though some of it looks a bit outdated). https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Bugzilla On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 12:47 PM Dmitry Zotikov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tommy! > > So I'm using version 5.9 (Build ID: 5.9+(2024-09-28)) on MacOS --- > that's the > latest available one in brew. I had the same issue on Linux though, also > in the > latest version available from flathub. > > On 2024-10-19 20:17, Tommy Trussell wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 4:38 AM Dmitry Zotikov > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > has anyone else noticed issues with CSV imports / exports in > > GnuCash 5.x? > > > > > > Apparently some have -- see the thread from yesterday titled "[GNC] > > duplicate transactions exported" > > > > You did not specify which version 5.x or operating system you are > > using, but in that thread, the final update indicated the problem > > existed in GnuCash 5.0 on Mac OS X but was fixed in GnuCash 5.9. So > > update to the most recent version and try again. > > > > When using "Trading accounts", no transactions under > > Trading:CURRENCY are > > included in the CSV export. Additionally, when importing the exported > > file back, > > I get this message: "No new transaction were found in this import." > > > > Used to work just fine in 4.x. > > > > > > If you are still having problems exporting and importing trading > > accounts, be sure to update this thread. > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
