Hi Liz,
I know what you're saying as far as GnuCash handling things "under the
hood" once the transactions are setup. The reason it's a bit annoying
(at least once a year) is that I usually need to adjust the estimated
payments each year. So it would be easier to only have to adjust 2
scheduled transactions, rather than having to edit and update 8 of them
individually every year.
As I said, it's really minor. But if anyone had come up with an easy
way to handle these kinds of irregular schedules it would be useful to
know about it. Editing 2 each year is better than editing 8. (Hey,
I'll admit I'm lazy.)
Tom
On 06/01/2026 10:00 PM, Liz wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2026 20:51:01 -0600
Tom Route36<[email protected]> wrote:
I know this isn't a big issue. But I'm just wondering if it's
possible to combine those 8 scheduled transactions into just 2. Any
advice would be appreciated.
I don't know of any way to do that.
I would also note that once they are all scheduled it doesn't really
matter how they appear in the editor for scheduled transactions, as
Gnucash handles the rest under the hood.
I have had 12 monthly tax payments listed, 4 occurring regularly at
quarterly intervals with one set of splits, and the other 8 on the
fill in months with a second set of splits.
I made separate entries for the second group as the only way I found to
manage this in Gnucash.
It was then of no concern until I needed to cancel eight separate
entries.
Liz
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
[email protected]
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
[email protected]
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
