Please remember to reply to the mailing list, not the original sender: http://gnudip2.sourceforge.net/#mailinglist
+++++++++ On Tuesday 23 April 2002 20:06, Mariano Absatz wrote: > > I'm not subscribed to the BIND list and most comments of this kind > tend to generate short of a flame ware in djbdns war :-) > here are the comments made on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (djbdns ml) so far ---- +---------- On Apr 22, Thilo Bangert said: > it seems nsupdate is doing an any query and is expecting the soa record > to be returned, something dnscache does not seem to do. When answering a QTYPE=* query, if dnscache finds records for the QNAME in its cache, it will only respond with one record type - CNAME if possible, else NS if possible, else various others. If dnscache doesn't find any cached records (or a cached NODATA/NXDOMAIN), then it will recursively resolve the domain and return all of the records it gets >from an authoritative server. > other comments? Perhaps you should just ask for an SOA, if that's what you want, instead of asking for ANY. But I don't know anything about nsupdate. ---- "Rob Mayoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +---------- On Apr 22, Thilo Bangert said: >> other comments? > > Perhaps you should just ask for an SOA, if that's what you want, instead > of asking for ANY. But I don't know anything about nsupdate. IIUC, they aren't looking for SOA. They're getting NXDOMAIN for the query name and expecting in that case to see the SOA for the *parent* domain, which dnscache does not provide. paul ---- -- GnuDIP Mailing List http://gnudip2.sourceforge.net/#mailinglist
