Hi, Randall! Am Donnerstag, den 30.09.2010, 11:36 -0700 schrieb Randall Whitman: > OK, as an exercise in better understanding the use of hbox/vbox - well > the use of managed layout - I started manually making a managed-layout > equivalent of absolute.gfd . Made quick attempt to add max-length to > one entry - looks like i didnt get it right yet, dont see max-length > in samples. (migrate1.gfd below)
Did I say "max-length"? Doh. The attributes are: min_width, min_height: minimum size (can't be shrinked to less than that) max_width, max_height: maximum size (doesn't grow bigger than that) def_width, def_height: default size (starts up with this size) Due to technical limitations of wx, def_width/height can't be different from min_width/height and is thus ignored. > Would we consider absolute.gfd a bit anomalous in having all unbound > fields? Yes, indeed. Actually, the anomality is that all fields are of undefined length: even unbound fields can (and usually would) have a datatype and length defined. > I've been brainstorming some ideas for migration. > Not sure that any of them will pan out, but if even one does, great. I tend to recommend to not put too much work into migration. I have no idea how many gfd's are out there which ever would be migrated, but I don't think there are tons of them. Thanks, Reinhard
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ gnue-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnue-dev
