> I don't have a problem with it having a high value since it does solve > the problems it claims, although only temporarily, but it should be > valued lower than the effective move, in this case T6. Now it's 29.21 > for Q7 and 28.90 for T6 so a simple workaround would be to add a > modest negative shape value for playing into snapback. There are, > however, oddities in the territorial valuation, which maybe should be > investigated first.
It seems to me that unless it is to make a ko threat, a snapback capture is never the correct move. This is a sanity check that is easy to implement reliably. Maybe after the trymove at value_moves.c:887 one should bail out if the move is a snapback capture. Dan _______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list gnugo-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
