Martin Holters wrote: >> > However, it breaks strategy5:225 and ninestones:40. In the latter, >> > the semeai reading looks bogus with and without the patch and I have >> > not really figured out why the patch results in preferring D2 over >> > C3. >> >> I agree about ninestones:40. D2 is extremely ugly but C2 just isn't >> working either. > > Maybe we should revise the regression test accordingly, also forbidding > C2?
Yes, that would be an improvement. I think the pattern below fixes the worst error in the semeai reading there, but I haven't checked yet how it behaves on the rest of the tests. It may be somewhat expensive. /Gunnar diff --git a/patterns/owl_attackpats.db b/patterns/owl_attackpats.db index ee75579..495e34f 100644 --- a/patterns/owl_attackpats.db +++ b/patterns/owl_attackpats.db @@ -3939,6 +3939,22 @@ x*.A ;owl_strong_dragon(B) && !xplay_disconnect(*,A,B) +Pattern A1025 +# gf New pattern. (3.9.1) + +YO.X stop escape along edge +OX*x +---- + +:8,-,value(75) + +AO.B +OX*x +---- + +;owl_escape_value(B)>0 && !xplay_disconnect(*,A,B) && !oplay_connect(*,A,B) + + ######################################################### # # # Reinforce the perimeter # _______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list gnugo-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
