On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Thien-Thi Nguyen <t...@gnu.org> wrote > > I have more prosaic desires, personally, but in the same direction > (probably requiring significant refactoring): > > - provide a "libgnugo" > - provide Guile (Scheme) bindings to that library > - integrate w/ SGF Utils (http://www.gnuvola.org/software/sgf-utils/) > - extend GTP to non-square boards >
It's encouraging to hear that other work might benefit. That takes some pressure off the more ambitious experimental aspect. On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Daniel Bump <b...@sporadic.stanford.edu>wrote: > Maybe we should leave it as it is. As I mentioned, I surveyed the > I can't make itnd found some with names, some not. > Let me know if there's anything > I can do. > Come again? I'd like to hear the rest of that first part... > See if Gunnar is interested. I personally wouldn't have time to work on > this, but if Gunnar was interested that would be a good thing. In A good thing indeed! > any case I'm sure the FSF would be interested in a stronger > GNU Go. You'd have to be prepared to assign copyright to the FSF. That's fine. Chad
_______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list gnugo-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
