Thank you for the suggestion. I think they will definitely make development easier. In normal cases, that would be great.
However, one of my primary goal is learning, and I want to be able to create something that can parser SGF files in an efficient way that I have thought up. Best Regards, Yuan Cao On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Thien-Thi Nguyen <t...@gnu.org> wrote: > () Daniel Bump <b...@sporadic.stanford.edu> > () Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:34:31 -0800 > > I think we used xpm because the format is simple, human > readable and files can be loaded into emacs. > > FWIW, there is now (Free Software) code to dynamically > generate XPMs. This can be used in gnugo.el (for Emacs). > See: <http://www.gnuvola.org/software/gnugo/>. > > Although OP wants to use Python, i suggest Emacs Lisp or > Guile Scheme, instead. For wrangling SGF w/ the latter, > see: <http://www.gnuvola.org/software/sgf-utils/>. > > -- > Thien-Thi Nguyen > GPG key: 4C807502 > (if you're human and you know it) > read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical) > (not (via 'mailing-list))) > => nil >
_______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list gnugo-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
