On Friday, August 26, 2022 06:44:28 AM Daniel Bump wrote:
> > I hope that by including gnugo-devel in the discussion, we can
> > get more perspectives and that the GNU Go maintainers can be
> > convinced to change their position to that of "do not keep
> > generated files under version control", on the way to eventually
> > approving a merge of that branch and future development along
> > those lines.
>
> I think I was the one that was arguing for this
> position (mainly so that someone could build gnugo more easily
> after downloading from savannah versus a tarball), and since Gunnar
> was not in agreement, I would not insist on the point.
>
> Dan
My personal opinion is that we should abandon autoconf and go to CMake
instead. It is so much easier to maintain and understand.
If there is interest, I can do the work.
-Inge
_______________________________________________
gnugo-devel mailing list
gnugo-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
