Personally I think that editing a progress note from another user SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED EVER EVER EVER [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@#
As you can see I feel strongly about this. Why would you allow that. I write my clinical notes. If I make changes within my current session, those changes should make up the medical record (not the bits I changed which should not be recorded). The record should not be committed to the datbase until I (the doctor) have decided that they should by hitting the save key, or the consultation is over. If I the doctor, want to then ammend/change, then this change is added sequentially to the record. If someone else wants to add/change, it is added sequentially to the record. Regards richard On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:17 am, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > What do people think: > > Should editing (eg intending to change) a progress > note previously entered by another user result in ... > > ... a new progress note being generated and the old one being > textually marked as "modified, see ..." > ... the original progress note being changed to the new > narrative attributed to the new user (the old one is still > preserved in the audit log, of course) > > Clinicians, please ! > > Karsten _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
