> > > I apologize for being a bit too open about code critiques, > Personally, I don't mind. Most of the time when you directly > questioned the quality of a piece of code (not the concept of > why it is there at all) you had found a bug. Why would we not > want to know that ? I fully agree.
> > > to make me look more amatuer about getting things to work e.g. I used > sql to > > update the cfg_string between status_quo and terry , > There's nothing amateurish about getting this done at the SQL level ! I wonder if my statement caused the confusion. I was trying to say that SQL is to advanced for the average user and Syan had a point there if it took SQL for him to get things done. Well I thought that was obvious and no user will/should be bothered in a release anyway so I could just as well have skipped the whole statement. My bad. Sebastian -- ************************************************************************* * * help solving the protein folding problem foldingathome.stanford.edu * * sign the linux driver petion : http://www.libranet.com/petition.html * ************************************************************************* DSL Komplett von GMX +++ Superg�nstig und stressfrei einsteigen! AKTION "Kein Einrichtungspreis" nutzen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
