catmat wrote: > the gap between gnumed and say CPRS is much less > then any of the other open source emrs recently crossposted as > comparisons to this list. > It is not hard to see that most of the functional requirements in CPRS are > in gnumed, and I as an outsider examining the code for some time now, > see there > is nothing insurmountable for gnumed to also implementing the few remaining > functional points in CPRS it doesn't already do.
Yes, I agree. Tim C _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
