> Sebastian Hilbert wrote: > > > feed back :-) Anyway. It should be high on the list for 0.12 > Certainly. > > BTW, most Linuxy types would read 0.12 as "point-twelve", that is, > implying 11 > prior versions. Good point. Maybe 0.1.0 0.1.2 0.1.4
We can always jump from 0.1.4 to 0.2.0 if we feel like implying substantial progress. > > I would just go from 0.1 to 0.2. It's not like we are going to run out of > integers. You mean 0.1 -- 0.2 -- 0.3 ? What about minor bugfix releases ? In general I like the idea of number below 1.0 before we put together a version we proudly call 1.0 but that will be matter of debate after our much anticipated version 0.1(.0) Sebastian > > Ian > > P.S. does anyone have any comment on using the user's mailreader to send > talkbacks? > > -- ************************************************************************* * * help solving the protein folding problem foldingathome.stanford.edu * * sign the linux driver petion : http://www.libranet.com/petition.html * ************************************************************************* Handyrechnung zu hoch? Tipp: SMS und MMS mit GMX Seien Sie so frei: Alle Infos unter http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freesms _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
