> I had in mind ClinicalScoring from which we can link AgeGestational > (except it is not really a score, is that a problem?), WellsScore and > any future scoring items. On the same page I can capture the design > discussion along with whatever method is adopted. ACK
> I also have a question about ClinicalOrganizingAndWorkflows. It > mainly consists of items built from a user-need point of view, > unconcerned with how the technical design may achieve it. Is there > agreement on some advantage to keep it such, and not mix into this > section the "programmatic" details? I think there is. Which isn't "agreement", though, by definition :-) As long as no programming has been done on an item we can keep the discussion about programming details linked to the clinical page. It can be moved to the Developer Guide once implemented. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
