On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:20, Syan Tan wrote: > On Sun Jul 17 13:52 , J Busser sent: > >This product has been demonstrated to administrative and IT leaders > >among health region and hospital administration and I am told has > >piqued their interest. > > > >Does anyone know it well enough to have insight into any Achilles > >heel(s) that it might have, as far as serving doctors well as an EMR > >(I mean over and above my presumption that it's a lock-in license > >paradigm): > > > >http://intrahealth.co.nz/index.html > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Gnumed-devel mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel > > I played with it a little about a year ago in a conference; > pretty flashy I remember; a bit complicated when compared to MD; > it has some templating features which remind me of CPRS, > i.e. buildable forms ; no idea how it actually works, > although one blurb said it had 3 tier separation etc.. > ? remote procedure calls to a server and remote objects > (meaning methods and objects are marshalled, serialized, sent > as a stream, and then unmarsalled into objects again, and > fed via a stub back into a function call on the server. > This is is not their doing , it's probably either COM+ > or java RMI, and may even be CORBA based. > ) > > instead of SQL on the wire ( which still has a lot going for it, > as debuggable with ethereal). > >
it does run on interbase. -- HUMAN REPLICAS are inserted into VATS of NUTRITIONAL YEAST ... _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
