> Another problem is we often simply don't agree on some functional aspects. > For example Richard and I find the episode-issue-problem-encounter system too > complex, It only seems complex. It's not something we've pulled out of the hat either. It's pretty much the standard model in the community. Any serious effort at modelling GP level health care has
- encounters - episodes - problem list The only thing we add is health issues. Which are added in a way that they can be pretty much ignored. Such that an interface could be written making them virtually invisible to the user. > we would be happy with a flat set of time-ordered progress notes > for 1.0, let alone 0.1. The data quality of such is abysmal. However, one might want to write a dumbed-down *interface* to the backend. Or else one might install FreePM or FreeMed or ... That would even gain one US billing. > The wiki should also include a (techically-oriented) page on how data makes > its > way from a backend table to the widget and back, I will write that next week. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
