On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:00:19AM +1000, Richard wrote: >>> Could I suggest that it include the time of consultation as per example >>> from my EMR dump to distinguish the various consultations from the same >>> day. >> The tree widget already does. I will install wx2.6 sometime within the next 3 weeks. From then on I will make sure the tree widget also works on 2.6. Nevertheless the formatting of progress notes is useful to either viewer
>> Which time(s) would you want to display and where ? This question still stands regardless of how things are formatted. We've got lots of times to chose from: - when the encounter/episode row was created - when the first item for the encounter/episode was created - respective for the last - each of the above (each and every single clinical item has its own last_modified time) > I started doing this inbetween patients yesterday - I've put in a html > control > and have got it running with dummy html data when you run the > gmEMRJournal.py. I've put it in table format with a column for the > date/data/consultation summary (your episode name maybe). Wait, if we do it we'll have to do it Right right from the beginning: I won't be working on any HTML template that can not represent several episodes per encounter nicely separated. Yes, there is room for a consultation summary but it is different from the episode name. In the least intelligent case it can simply be a concatenation of the relevant episode names which in the simplest (and quite common) case is just one episode name. > Now I've got to try > and link it to real data - I'll fiddle over the next two or three weeks > before I go on holidays and mail you the resul. Good. I am looking forward to that and will surely strongly consider it for inclusion. Notice, however, that I will not consider for inclusion anything that is not able to distinguish several episodes per encounter (eg per consultation). But you knew that and you did not intend any different, I suppose. > > > Also, I've previously commented on the lack of visual updating of the > > > screen. > > I know. I have previously commented that I seemed to be > > unable to solve that. Hilmar solved it for wx2.4. Maybe > > someone is able to solve it for 2.6, too. > Ok, if I know its a bug I'll maybe look at it. It's definitely a bug in my code !!! > > > Note also that if one tries to 'reload' the same patients notes, that > > > nothing happens - try loading kirk's notes, then erase his name, and type > > > it in again and hit enter. > > I know. That's intentional :-) Once the above bug has been > > fixed it'll make more sense. However, we can make it a > > config option, too, if you think so. > Yes OK, will work on that shortly. However, what is your use case or which problem do you hope to solve by it ? I don't see one. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
