On Thursday 29 September 2005 20:53, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > There has been differences in what people think of the > > "announcability" of what we have. I for one am fine with > > announcing our progress. > > I'm afraid of the effect that other practice management systems > are drawing many developers on their side just because they make > much noise. Might happen but if you the base is small anyway. I know we encountered at least two views on how GNUmed should be developed but I will go with announce and document what we have. GNUmed deserves the best documentation because it has the best code base. If we are to draw a single developer we need to make darn sure to keep him or her. So my intent is to improve our documentation. The wiki is an excellent start but I envision a full blown concept.
Now I am dreaming again. > Sebastian -- Sebastian Hilbert Leipzig / Germany [www.openmed.org] -> PGP welcome, HTML ->/dev/null ICQ: 86 07 67 86 -> No files, no URL's VoIP: callto://[EMAIL PROTECTED] My OS: Suse Linux. Geek by Nature, Linux by Choice _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
