On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:38:53PM +0100, RKI Andreas wrote: >>> For instance if you call plugins independently from GNUmed (for instance >>> the BMI plugin) >> We don't. And just because it's possible doesn't mean it's >> really intended. I am not sure I understand why you are >> hooked on that so much. > > Your initial introduction of GNUmed to me was that we want to make doctors > adictive of GNUmed by just giving them small standalone plugins which than > will be wrapped by a fully functional practice management system. Ah, OK, I recall that.
> If this philosophy is valid up to now (IMHO it is good, but I don't know how > important this is) we should care for these single plugins. That's all. I see. Yes, in a way it's still a valid strategy. However: On Debian there isn't really any "other" package to lure people away from ;-) Hence I can relieve you of the burden to maintain a gazillion little plugin packages ... A simple apt-cache search practice | grep management will get us there soon enough ! Thanks for you work/input, Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
