On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:56:56AM +1100, Tim Churches wrote: > > Nearly all the claiming-to-be-EMR OSS packages are NOTHING > > BUT such. They are billing frontends with some clinical > > stuff bolted on. Encounter support in, say, OpenEMR is > > unlikely to be at all driven by clinical desire but rather > > by the need to document level-of-care-per-encounter for > > billing reasons. > Yeah, but Karsten, that's what the majority of punters[1] want. Tim, with you being so well-travelled in the Phillipines and Malaysia and all, I thought about half of the world are Chinese ? *evil grin*
But I get your point. I am not saying those packages are useless, either, they just are not EMRs. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
