On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:09:42AM -0800, Jim Busser wrote: > It isn't clear to me that either project needs to be "chosen" over > the other, although to spread the available energy across both would > slow net progress. Both true.
> However, given OpenTAPAS is open source, should we be attentive to > whether it can be helped, yes > for example suggesting & helping (if they > want/need) with pgautodoc & other tools & approaches? They seem to be well structured already. > And if we identify that OpenTAPAS becomes usable to meet doctors' > (even just some doctors' needs) earlier or more suitably than GNUmed, > should we look to help that to happen? I am not initially interested in making things happen for other doctors. I want to make things happen for me. But I am willing to work with anyone who wants to make GNUmed happen for them. Even if that means things will be done differently than I would have done them for myself alone. Because I think it will benefit me, eventually, too. > But the larger purpose is to instill open source software into > clinical practice. Not mine, not really. However, I am fine with it happening through my helping. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
