Carlos Moro wrote: > I trying now GNUMed with PostgreSQL 8.0.4 with pypgsql 2.4 under > gentoo and seems working ok. At least Kirk loads right ...
Sebastian Hilbert wrote: > I am on SUSE 10.1/10.0 , PostgreSQL 8.0.3 > pypgsql works fine. I used an rpm I created some time ago. > > Works with GNUmed and postgreSQL 8 on Windows as well. > > Still think it sucks that pypgsql is not included in SUSE. > Showstopper for some people. I shouldn't be too hard to switch > to another dbdriver in the future. OK, thanks Carlos and Sebastian - it seems that pyPgSQL can be made to work with PG v8.0.x - I'll try again. I nearly went made trying to get it to compile with PG v8.1.x pyPgSQL is not supported for Fedora Core, either. In fcat, Fedora Core 5 now installs with a base module called "python-postgresql", but I haven't investigated which Python-PG driver module this actually is. It is not pyPgSQL, however. Unfortunately some of our NetEpi code has dependencies on pyPgSQL - in places where the standard Python DB-API-2 was not quite enough. We'll have a serious look at validating and packaging pyPgSQL (with our patches) on Debian and Fedora as an easier course than swapping to some other module. Tim C > Tim Churches wrote: > Carlos (and Sebastian and others), > > Were ypu able to get pyGgSQL to compile OK with PostgreSQL v8.0? I tried > it yesterday with PG v8.1 on Fedora Core 5 and it complained about all > sorts of things. Gerhard Haering, the former maintainer of pyPgSQL, > seems to have dropped the project (we submitted bug fixes nearly a year > ago, still not incorporated in CVS or the traball, despite reminders), > so are are resigned to getting pyPgSQL working and validated for Pg 8.x > ourselves. But perhaps GNUmed has already done that? > > Tim C _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
