On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 08:46:15AM +1000, syan tan wrote: > > > If we were starting stoday, we would use openEHR > > > archetypes or a variation thereof, but we'd need to spend > > > 6-12 months building the engine ourselves. > > If I had the manpower I'd go that route, too, yes. > how would that be faster than storing entity attribute values ? The suggested storage architecture for openEHR artifacts is medium-granularity blobs quite similar to what NetEpis form defs are. It would carry over that advantage (fewer subqueries to retrieve relevant chunks) to the form data itself.
The real benefit of it, however, would be cleanly modelled infrastructure. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
