On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:07:32 am Karsten Hilbert wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:49:45PM -0500, Dave Cramer wrote: > > FWIW, I'm inclined to just use the hapi library and parse it myself. > > As long as its maintainable, fine. > > Karsten
What's hapi? Personally It Think Mirth is the way to go because you can take disparate information from different sources eg multiple pathology labs, and once you've set up your queries can merge them into a common database format, even where the hl7 segments don't always align (which I guess they should but they don't seem to always). Also having MIRTH as a 'blackbox' you can route outcomes of your parsing anywhere. I've not found the MIRTH community very supportive in the last week of trying to get it working, though I got one really good reply from a guy about why my mirth was being really slow to boot up in linux. Regards Richard _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
